Barney harris vaccine10/4/2023 So, now Moderna has a new rule: it won’t enforce its patents… in poor countries. At least according to Moderna’s execs who want to start shaking down other companies for cash. Guess what? Apparently the pandemic’s over. Pandemic to an end as quickly as possible. Moderna refrained from asserting its patents earlier so as not to distract from efforts to bring the ![]() Our COVID-19 related patents against those making vaccines intended to combat the pandemic.”3 Given the unprecedented challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, Moderna voluntarily pledged on Octothat, “while the pandemic continues, Moderna will not enforce To say that it’s not using anything “generated during Moderna and NIH’s collaboration to combat COVID-19” cleverly cuts out all of the collaboration before 2020.įrom there, Moderna insists that, really, people should view it as the good guy here, because - IN THIS COMPLAINT IN WHICH IT IS SUING OVER ITS COVID VACCINE - it notes that it promised not to sue over the COVID vaccine “during the pandemic.” Basically, all of the technology that was necessary to combat COVID. This lawsuit does not relate to any patent rights generated during Moderna andīut, uh, the details above were from before COVID, when NIH scientists helped Moderna - playing a “substantial role” in crafting the underlying technology. Of course, Moderna knows this is going to come up, so it uses some weasel words to try to pretend this lawsuit isn’t about anything publicly funded. And we won’t get into just how much the US taxpayer paid the company as the US government (smartly) paid for the public to get vaccinated and protected from COVID. So, already, Moderna’s narrative about how it’s just some little guy with a great invention is pretty sketchy. In a July filing with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the company said it had “reached the good-faith determination that these individuals did not co-invent” the component in question. Corbett, who is now at Harvard - worked with Moderna scientists to design the genetic sequence that prompts the vaccine to produce an immune response, and should be named on the “principal patent application.” The agency says three scientists at its Vaccine Research Center - Dr. A year ago this month, the government called it the “N.I.H.-Moderna Covid-19 vaccine.” The vaccine grew out of a four-year collaboration between Moderna and the N.I.H., the government’s biomedical research agency - a partnership that was widely hailed when the shot was found to be highly effective. Indeed, as a NY Times report from last year noted, initially people were referring to it as the “NIH-Moderna COVID-19 vaccine,” and then Moderna took over the marketing, and basically cut the government out. Moderna has admitted that US scientists played a “substantial role” in the development. The fact is, Moderna doesn’t happen without massive taxpayer funding and massive support from US government scientists. ![]() We covered this last year when Moderna was trying to block US government scientists from even being listed on its patents. While it does mention that Moderna teamed up with the National Institutes for Health, it leaves out that it was the US taxpayer and US government employees who were critical in helping Moderna develop its mRNA technology. You can read the legal complaint which is full of bluster about how brilliant Moderna is and how it saved the world and blah blah blah. You may have heard last week that Moderna is suing Pfizer, claiming that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine violates Moderna’s patents. Wed, Aug 31st 2022 10:53am - Mike Masnick
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |